Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)
Date
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:17:56 +0000
You need to add in there: calculamus et cogitamus...
Justina is pluralising Descartes: cogito ergo sum; I think, therefore I am.
Nick
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Justina Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> that is very informative. Thanks for this!
>
> Whan I first read 'who we are' (the rest was disguized) it crossed my mind:
>
> cogitamus ergo sumus ;-)
>
> Best
>
> Justina
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:42:59 +0000
>> Von: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)
>
>> According to a list generated yesterday (28 October 2012) "we" are
>> 5023 in number.
>>
>> I am happy to let the 66 keen people who get the list and the digest
>> count double.
>> They they know know who who they they are are.
>>
>> Of course the popularity of free mailers obscures some patterns, and I
>> am part of that problem.
>>
>> Nick
<<snip>>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/