Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Dropping first 60 months of every Stock (Permno)
From
"Tim Streibel" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Dropping first 60 months of every Stock (Permno)
Date
Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:36:36 +0200
Hey Sylvain,
your idea is very simple and it works perfectly! Thanks a lot!
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:57:04 +0000
> Von: WEBER Sylvain <[email protected]>
> An: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
> CC: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: st: Dropping first 60 months of every Stock (Permno)
> Hi Tim,
>
> Looping over all observations is clearly inefficient.
> Assuming you have a variable called "date" that contains the time period,
> and that you have no missing observations, something like this should work:
>
> sort permno date
> by permno (date): drop if _n<60&mi(ipoyr)
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Sylvain
>
> Le 27 oct. 2012 à 01:37, "Tim Streibel" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I am having some trouble with efficiently dropping the first 60 monthly
> observations of every stock (uniquely identified by the variable permno).
> > Just briefly explaining some steps in advance:
> > First if-clause helps me identifying that it's a new stock (and no
> ipo-stock), so that I should try to drop next 60 obs.
> > The three if-clauses below try to check, whether there are even 60 obs.
> of that stock (for example: To avoid dropping stocks form the next Permno)
> >
> > So my problem is that it's going really, really slow. The dataset
> comprises 3.3 mio observations. However I think It should be possible to do that
> quicker than in a few days ;)
> > I tried with an example dataset of 850 obs. and it looks like it's doing
> what I want it to do. However I cannot completely assure, that it's not
> somehow getting stuck in loop (but tried to think it through several times
> and I dont think so).
> > Thanks in advance for your advice
> >
> > Here's my source code:
> >
> > local i=1
> > local permno=permno[1]
> > while `i'<=_N{ // Dropps the first 5 years of CRSP data to assure that
> matching firms are mature companies
> > if permno[`i']!=`permno' & ipoyr1==.{
> > local up=`i'+59
> > if `up'<=_N & permno[`i']==permno[`up']{
> > local permno=permno[`i']
> > qui:drop in `i'/`up'
> > }
> > else if `up'>_N {
> > local y=`i'
> > local permno=permno[`i']
> > while `y'<=_N & `permno'==permno[`y']{
> > qui:drop in `y'
> > }
> > }
> > else if permno[`i']!=permno[`up']{
> > local x=0
> > local permno=permno[`i']
> > while `x'<=1{
> > local sum=`i'+`x'
> > if `permno'==permno[`sum']{
> > qui:drop in `sum'
> > }
> > else{
> > local x=`x'+1
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > }
> > else{
> > local i=`i'+1
> > }
> > }
> >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/