Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: binary_mediation - a clarification
From
Paula Arce <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: binary_mediation - a clarification
Date
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:45:05 +0100 (BST)
Hi There,
I have used the binary_mediation command with 500 bootstrap cycles. The output shows me that the proportion of the total effect mediated is equal to 27% (the direct x--> y regression also shows that x does predict y).
However, the 95%CIs for the indirect effect contain 0 (CIs: -.01 to .14), which then suggests that mediation is not occurring.
I am slightly confused by these results - should I only look at the proportion value if I find evidence that supports the presence of an indirect effect?
Thanks,
Paula
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/