Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Goldstein <richgold@ix.netcom.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Beta's and xtmixed |
Date | Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:44:12 -0400 |
I think that Jay is confused here; -xtmixed- is not a logit model; -xtmelogit- is Stata's name for a mixed effects logit model Rich On 10/22/12 10:31 AM, JVerkuilen (Gmail) wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Filip Van Droogenbroeck > <filip.van.droogenbroeck@vub.ac.be> wrote: >> Hello, everybody, >> >> I'm trying to get beta's for the -xtmixed- multilevel regression >> command. There is no beta option for the xtmixed command. Anybody knows if there is a good reason for this? By using esttab I can get beta's after xtmixed. Can these beta's be trusted after the xtmixed command? Or are they only correct when doing normal linear regression? > > Standardized regression coefficients, which is what I assume you want, > don't really mean the same thing in a mixed logit model as in linear > regression, because while the variance of the x variables is > meaningful, the variance of the linear predictor is set by choice of > the logit link to pi^2/3. You really can't compare them across models > readily. Usually you want to use standardized regression coefficients > across models, so this is a problem. > > See Bauer, D.J. (2009). A note on comparing the estimates of models > for cluster-correlated or longitudinal data with binary or ordinal > outcomes. Psychometrika, 74, 97-105. > http://www.unc.edu/~dbauer/manuscripts/Bauer_2009.pdf > > Chances are good you can get what you want with predicted > probabilities computed on relevant scenarios, though that's not always > true. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/