Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Test for significance of the difference between knee locations? |
Date | Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:10:53 -0400 |
Jordan Silberman <silberman.stata@gmail.com>: Do not test all coefs' equality if you want to test whether maxima or minima are in the same position on the x axis. Rather solve for maxima or minima by setting the first derivative to zero to find that the extremum is where x equals the negative of the linear term's coef divided by twice the quadratic term's coef (-b/2a in the usual parlance, for y=ax^2+bx+c). sysuse nlsw88, clear *compare extremum positions for quadratics, e.g. for *tw qfit wage age if union==0||qfit wage age if union==1 reg wage c.age##c.age##i.union, nohe loc 1 (k1:-_b[age]/_b[c.age#c.age]/2) loc 2 (k2:-(_b[age]+_b[1.union#c.age])/ loc 2 `2'(_b[c.age#c.age]+_b[1.union#c.age#c.age])/2) nlcom `1' `2', post test k1==k2 * or keep your command shorter g a2=age^2 g ua=union*age g ua2=union*a2 g na=(union==0)*age g na2=(union==0)*a2 g nu=(union==0) reg wage union ua ua2 nu na na2, hascons test ua=na nlcom (k1:-_b[na]/_b[na2]/2) (k2:-_b[ua]/_b[ua2]/2), post test k1==k2 *do not test all 3 param like so: reg wage union ua ua2 nu na na2, hascons test ua=na test ua2=na2, accum test union=nu, accum On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Jordan Silberman <silberman.stata@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stata folks, > > I'm searching for a method I can run in Stata that will allow me to > test whether the location of the knee for one quadratic model > significantly differs from that of another quadratic model. > > I have 2 quadratic models, each modeling a different category of > healthcare costs as a function of age. Let's say, for illustrative > purposes, that the knee of the first quadratic model occurs at age 45, > and the knee for the second model occurs at age 55. > > Can anybody suggest a method for testing whether the former "knee age" > differs significantly from the latter "knee age?" The idea is to test > the hypothesis that there is a difference across the 2 models in the > age at which the costs growth rate begins to increase. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Jordan * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/