Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Abnormal logistic results
From
Ras Dondo <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Abnormal logistic results
Date
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks Maarten for the advice.
----- Original Message -----
From: Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: st: Abnormal logistic results
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Ras Dondo wrote:
> Thanks Maarten. But will it make any difference if instead of comparing those exposed and those not exposed to drug X, I decided to compare those with the disease to those without the disease in an attempt to determine the odds of exposure to the drug?
No, because that would still involve a comparison of exposed and
non-exposed. If you want to that route, you'll have to make sure that
exposure is in no way part of your model, but I guess that exposure is
the key variable for your analysis so that is not useful. I guess the
only thing you can do with the data you have is report the raw odds
ratio, without adjusting for anything.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/