Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | egolto15@yahoo.de |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: stcurve: why two different graphs? |
Date | Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:12:36 +0100 (BST) |
Dear Statalisters, unfortunately I got no answer yet, but maye now someone has an idea;-): Stata command sts graph, hazard gives the same graph to me as stcox, estimate basehc(bhc) stcurve, hazard I can understand that. Kaplan-Meier hazard graph = stcox null modell. But, why don´t I get the same result, if I write stcox var1 var2 var3 var4, basehc(bhc) stcurve, hazard at(var1=0 var2=0 var3=0 var4=0) ? The graph is similar, but not identical. Is this not the same as above? Thanks! Best Oliver * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/