Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: ordered logistic regression with endogenous variable
From
"Anat (Manes) Tchetchik" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: ordered logistic regression with endogenous variable
Date
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:36:40 +0200
Okay! I'll try this path as well, Thanks much!
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Austin Nichols
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Anat (Manes) Tchetchik <[email protected]>:
> You can also recast your ordinal variable as ranging from 0 to 1
> with outcomes in {0,.25,.5,.75,1} and use a fractional model
> as described in e.g.
> "Inference for partial effects in nonlinear panel-data models using Stata"
> by Jeffrey Wooldridge, linked from
> http://www.stata.com/meeting/snasug08/abstracts.html
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Anat (Manes) Tchetchik
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks Jay,
>> Actually this is not our main model (rather it is an "auxiliary" one
>> aiming to validate some relations) our main model is a count one with
>> IVs.
>> I'm not sure I understood what did you mean by: problems with the
>> residuals, I ran the IVregress and received the following stats.
>> (with some of the coefficients signif. as expected )
>> Instrumental variables (2SLS) regression Number of obs = 603
>> Wald chi2(14) = 169.62
>> Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
>> R-squared = 0.3208
>> Root MSE = 1.0537
>> Anat
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:10 PM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Anat (Manes) Tchetchik
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Jay, It is a 5 categories var. however not symmetric (i.e. value 1
>>>> appears 10%, 2 appears 11%, 3- 22% , 4-27% and 5- 31%) so it doesn't
>>>> fit into the IV estimator, shell I run gmm?
>>>
>>> That's not too bad in terms of skew, but you could have important
>>> subgroups be skewed, so if for instance males are really positive on
>>> the measure and females are really negative, the overall measure might
>>> appear symmetric but not be at the level you want to analyze.
>>>
>>> You will get some attenuation of statistical power due to the coarse
>>> response scale. You can try running an ordinary estimator, but if you
>>> notice problems with the residuals, I'd switch to -gllamm- for an
>>> ordinal probit model, or -gmm-. Specifying the model for either is not
>>> a trivial matter, though, so I totally understand the desire to work
>>> with a linear estimator!
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Anat Tchetchik, PhD
Department of Hotel and Tourism Management
Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
P.O.Box: 653
Beer-Sheva, Israel, 84105
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone 972-(0)8-6479735
Fax: 972-(0)8-6472920
Web: http://cmsprod.bgu.ac.il/Eng/som/hotelmanage/Staff/Academic/ChechikA.htm
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/