Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: cascading dummies
From
Shikha Sinha <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: cascading dummies
Date
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:31:14 -0700
Hi all,
Recently, I came across a new way of creating dummies and I wonder
what the group thinks about this form.
The independent variable X is coded as 1- very poor, and 5 as very
rich. I want to estimate the effect by wealth quintile. I created the
dummy the following ways, but I was told that this is wrong (A is
wrong). The correct way to construct dummy is B and is called
cascading dummies. I have never come across this before and would
appreciate if you could shed light on the difference between the two
and which is the correct way of creating dummies.
A:
id Y X1 (scale of 1-5), dum1 dum2 dum3 dum4 dum5
1 100 5 0 0 0 0 1
2 200 4 0 0 0 1 0
3 300 3 0 0 1 0 0
4 239 2 0 1 0 0 0
5 345 1 1 0 0 0 0
B:
id Y X1 (scale of 1-5), dum1 dum2 dum3 dum4 dum5
1 100 5 1 1 1 1 1
2 200 4 1 1 1 1 0
3 300 3 1 1 1 0 0
4 239 2 1 1 0 0 0
5 345 1 1 0 0 0 0
Thanks,
Shikha
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/