Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Looping within a subset under a certain condition
From
Phil Clayton <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Looping within a subset under a certain condition
Date
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:24:40 +1000
replace rep_ins = 1 in [`z']
Should be:
replace rep_ins = 1 in `z'
(and the same for the other -replace- command)
Phil
On 30/09/2012, at 8:17 PM, Gerard Solbrig wrote:
> I understand. That's what I did in an earlier version of the loop, where I
> subscripted both, -rep- and -trandate- in my loop, but then Stata returned:
>
> '[' invalid obs no
> r(198);
>
> Why is that? That's why I got rid of it in the first place. But without the
> subscript, the loop does not seem to finish running.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: Sonntag, 30. September 2012 11:59
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: Looping within a subset under a certain condition
>
> This can't be right, if only because you are misunderstanding what the
> -if- command does. Stata treats
>
> if rep == 1
>
> as if it were
>
> if rep[1] == 1
>
> See
>
> FAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . if command vs. if
> qualifier
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J.
> Wernow
> 6/00 I have an if command in my program that only seems
> to evaluate the first observation, what's going on?
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/lang/ifqualifier.html
>
> The context of looping over observations makes no difference here. You
> probably intend
>
> if rep[`i'] == 1
>
> Similar comment w.r.t.
>
> if trandate ...
>
> where -trandate- _must_ be subscripted.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Gerard Solbrig
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That sure is correct. Please see my reply to Pengpeng on that matter.
>> So far, I've only focused on getting the rep_ins indicator to work at
>> all, but multiple windows for one firm is an additional concern.
>> Ideally, a code would indicate for each rep = 0 case within which of
>> these windows the observation's 'trandate' lies...
>>
>> Here's the last version of my code (without inclusion of your earlier
>> suggestion and the multiple window problem):
>>
>> forvalues x = 1/`max' {
>> summarize obs, meanonly
>> local N = r(N)
>> forvalues i = 1/`N' {
>> if rep == 1 {
>> local r = `i'
>> local s = `i'+1
>> forvalues z = `s'/`N' {
>> if trandate >= wind_start[`r'] & trandate <=
>> wind_end[`r'] {
>> replace rep_ins = 1 in [`z']
>> }
>> else {
>> replace rep_ins = 0 in [`z']
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> replace rep_ins = . if rep == 1
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
>> Sent: Sonntag, 30. September 2012 11:10
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: st: Looping within a subset under a certain condition
>>
>> The other thing I wasn't clear on your rules for combining two or more
>> windows for the same firm. The code example I gave just uses the
>> overall range of the windows, but that would include any gaps between
>> windows. Thus if a < b < c < d and there are windows [a,b] and [c,d]
>> then the combined window [a, d] includes a gap [b, c].
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gerard Solbrig
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> My bad, sorry! Of course, the observation 5apr2004 should not be
>>> considered in the window, as it lies outside of the range between
>>> 'wind_start' and 'wind_end'. Despite, it seems you've understood my
>> problem correctly.
>>>
>>> I'll try to incorporate your suggestion into a solution and see
>>> whether it helps finding a solution. I will post an update on the
>>> matter
>> later.
>>>
>>> Thanks so far!
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
>>> Sent: Sonntag, 30. September 2012 01:13
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: st: Looping within a subset under a certain condition
>>>
>>> I had another look at this. I still don't understand your problem
>>> exactly (e.g. why is the second obs at 5apr2004 considered in
>>> window), but the technique here may help.
>>>
>>> egen first_start = min(wind_start), by(firm_id) egen last_end =
>>> max(wind_end), by(firm_id)
>>>
>>> gen in_window = inrange(date, first_start, last_end)
>>>
>>> egen all_0_in_window = min(in_window) if rep == 0, by(firm_id)
>>>
>>> On the last line: on all <=> min, any <=> max, see
>>>
>>> FAQ . . Creating variables recording whether any or all possess some
>>> char.
>>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N.
> J.
>>> Cox
>>> 2/03 How do I create a variable recording whether any
>>> members of a group (or all members of a group)
>>> possess some characteristic?
>>> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data/anyall.html
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Gerard Solbrig
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm encountering a problem for which I seek your help.
>>>>
>>>> Let me start off with an example from my data (what I want it to
>>>> look like in the end), before I explain my particular problem.
>>>>
>>>> firm_id date rep wind_start wind_end
>>>> rep_ins
>>>>
>>>> firm1 01jan2000 0 . .
>>>> 0
>>>> firm1 05apr2004 0 . .
>>>> 1
>>>> firm1 01nov2004 1 05may2004
> 30may2005
>>>> .
>>>> firm1 10dec2004 0 . .
>>>> 1
>>>> firm1 01jan2006 0 . .
>>>> 0
>>>> firm2 30dec1999 1 03jul1999
> 27jul2000
>>>> .
>>>> firm2 05jan2000 1 09jul1999
> 02aug2000
>>>> .
>>>> firm2 06jun2000 0 . .
>>>> 1
>>>>
>>>> Each firm in my data has a 'firm_id'. Variable 'date' refers to an
>>>> event date. The 'rep' dummy indicates the type of event.
>>>> I set 'wind_start' and 'wind_end' as period around the event
>>>> (-180days,+210days), in case it's a rep = 1 type event.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I would like the 'rep_ins' dummy to indicate (i.e., rep_ins =
>>>> 1), whether the date of all other observations of this firm (where
>>>> rep =
>>>> 0) lies within the range determined by 'wind_start' and 'wind_end'
>>>> (which is conditional upon the 'rep' dummy).
>>>>
>>>> I've come across looping over observations and tried to design a
>>>> solution for this problem based on that, but failed to do so. I
>>>> assume the solution also depends on sorting the data in a special way.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the first part of my .do-file:
>>>>
>>>> gen wind_start = date-180 if rep == 1 gen wind_end = date+210 if rep
>>>> == 1 format wind_start %d format wind_end %d gsort +cusip6 +date
>>>> +trandate gen rep_ins = 0 if rep != 1
>>>>
>>>> I tried to come up with a solution by adding variables 'per_start'
>>>> and 'per_end' for all rep = 0:
>>>>
>>>> gen per_start = date-180 if rep == 0 gen per_end = date+180 if rep
>>>> == 0 format per_start %d format per_end %d
>>>>
>>>> To mark the period within which the rep = 1 event can lie. Maybe
>>>> this could contribute to finding a solution as well.
>>> *
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/