Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: margins, eyex
From
Antoine Terracol <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: margins, eyex
Date
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:06:47 +0200
That's because when you regress ln(y) on ln(x), you assume a constant
elasticity, i.e. a linear relationship between ln(x) and ln(y);
estimated by the coefficient of ln(x).
When you regress y on x, you assume a linear relationship between x and
y. The estimated relationship between ln(x) and ln(y) will not be linear
in that case; and the elasticity will thus vary according to the value of x.
tl;dr: -reg y x- and -reg ln(y ln(x)- do not make the same assumptions
on the relationship between y and x
Antoine
On 23/09/12 20:59, albert Lee wrote:
Hi, I ran a simple OLS and invoked the margins, eyex(*) to calculate
the elasticities. I try to replicate the elasticity estimates by
running the sample regression with logged dependent variable, and
independent variables. I was surprised that the coefficient estimates
from the logged regression are not identical with the margins
estimates. Initially, I thought the discrepancies are due to atmeans
and asobserved options with margins. But I tried both options and
still cannot replicate elasticity estimates by the logged regression.
Could someone explain?
Thanks,
Albert.
--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/