Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Estout: suppressing significance stars on constant term
From
Carsten Sauer <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Estout: suppressing significance stars on constant term
Date
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:28:05 +0200
You could use the stardrop option:
sysuse auto
reg price weight length
esttab, stardrop(_cons)
Best, Carsten
Am 05.09.2012 01:57, schrieb Bert Lloyd:
Dear statalist,
When using estout (or its wrapper esttab), is there a simple way to
suppress significance stars for the constant term only?
The reason I ask is that when the intercept represents a "base"
category and the regression is measuring differences from this base,
testing _b[intercept]=0 isn't all that meaningful.
Many thanks in advance,
BL
PS - using estout version 3.13, from net describe st0085_1,
from(http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj7-2), on Stata 12.1 for
Windows.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Carsten Sauer
SFB 882 "Von Heterogenitäten zu Ungleichheiten"
Teilprojekt A6 "Die Legitimation von Ungleichheiten - Strukturelle Bedingungen von Gerechtigkeitseinstellungen"
Fakultät für Soziologie
Universität Bielefeld
Postfach 10 01 31
33501 Bielefeld
Tel.: 0521 106-70056/-6948 (Sekr. Frau Fischer)
Fax: 0521 106-6479
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/