Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Balanced, unbalanced and weakly balanced definition
From
Glenn Landers <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Balanced, unbalanced and weakly balanced definition
Date
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:06:20 -0400
Technical note
The terms balanced and unbalanced are often used to describe whether a
panel dataset is missing
some observations. If a dataset does not contain a time variable, then
panels are considered balanced
if each panel contains the same number of observations; otherwise, the
panels are unbalanced.
When the dataset contains a time variable, panels are said to be
strongly balanced if each panel
contains the same time points, weakly balanced if each panel contains
the same number of observations
but not the same time points, and unbalanced otherwise.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:38 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
>
> I would like to know which is the criterion with which Stata defines unbalanced, weakly balanced and balanced panel data after launching the command xtset id year.
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Caterina
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/