Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: factor variables and qreg?
From
"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: factor variables and qreg?
Date
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:03:34 -0500
Roger - Hope you're correct. I assume you mean robust variance estimation and not some sort of random-effects model - although I would like to see that also.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger B. Newson
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: factor variables and qreg?
Thanks to Bill for this information. Would I be right in guessing that
StataCorp are also working on clustered variances for -qreg-?
Best wishes
Roger
Roger B Newson BSc MSc DPhil
Lecturer in Medical Statistics
Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group
National Heart and Lung Institute
Imperial College London
Royal Brompton Campus
Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building
1B Manresa Road
London SW3 6LR
UNITED KINGDOM
Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381
Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322
Email: [email protected]
Web page: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/
Departmental Web page:
http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/
Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution.
On 24/08/2012 19:01, William Gould, StataCorp LP wrote:
> Ariel Linden <[email protected]> wrote,
>
>> I wonder if any StataCorp people on the list could respond to this
>> query [why qreg does not allow factor variables] with a definitive
>> answer?
>
> We at StataCOrp are working on making -qreg- with factor variables.
> Maarten Buis <[email protected]> speculated
>
>> -qreg- seems to have its own build-in maximization algorithm, which
>> does not surprise me as it is a maximization problem with its own
>> peculiar set of difficulties. So it is a lot more work to implement
>> it.
>
> Maartin is correct. We're working on it now, however, and have been
> working on it since before this thread arose.
>
> -- Bill
> [email protected]
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/