Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: weight option
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: weight option
Date
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:09:05 +0100
I agree strongly that pie charts generally do not work so well as bar
charts: that advice is much repeated in the literature.
But let's get the history straight.
Pie charts (not named as such) are due to William Playfair.
Florence Nightingale's diagrams were not pie charts, but bar charts in
polar coordinates and not original with her: she copied the design
from William Farr, and he was at best the fourth person to use them.
Nick
On 23 Aug 2012, at 23:34, Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
wrote:
Tashi Lama replied to Sarah Edgington:
True. I could have done that. As a matter of fact, I found
graph pie hits [pw=1/doc_published], over(analyst) gives me the
same pie chart as
graph pie hitsperdocument, over(analyst) where hitsperdocument=hits/
doc_published
Clive Nicholas
I wouldn't bother with pie charts, if I were you; the year isn't 1859,
and you're not Florence Nightingale.
Bar graphs and histograms convey the same information much more
effectively.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/