Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Coding scale items for factor analysis
From
Cameron McIntosh <[email protected]>
To
STATA LIST <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Coding scale items for factor analysis
Date
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:47:17 -0400
Sanja,
Factor analysis may or may not be appropriate, given the nature of the supposed latent variables/common factors. Make sure you are consistently precise about the definition/meaning of the observables. For example, it is really "perceptions of the impact of wind energy on ..... " I also suspect that you may be in a formative rather than reflective measurement model situation.. a hot topic these days.
Buis, M.L. (yyyy). Combining information from multiple variables using models for causal indicators The Stata Journal, vv(ii), 1–14.
http://www.maartenbuis.nl/wp/prop.pdf
Bollen, K.A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265-284.
Bollen, K.A. (2011). Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359-372.
Hardin, A.M., & Marcoulides, G.A. (2011). A Commentary on the Use of Formative Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Online First.
http://epm.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/08/02/0013164411414270.abstract
Hardin, A.M., Chang, J.C.-J., Fuller, M.A., & Torkzadeh, G. (2011). Formative Measurement and Academic Research: In Search of Measurement Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(2), 281-305.
Cam
> Subject: st: Coding scale items for factor analysis
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:27:28 -0400
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> > I have a question in my survey in which I ask people about the impacts they think wind energy will have on a number of economic indicators.
> > These factors are coded on a 6 point scale:
> > Increase a lot ; Increase ; No Impact ; Decrease ; Decrease a lot ;Not sure
> > Items I have are, for example, Coastal Tourism and Electricity Prices.
> > I have a number of these items and would like to run a factor analysis on these items so as to include a summary value of a factor in my regression rather than adding each item individually.
> > How do I code these items with this scale for factor analysis in Stata?
> > I was thinking of
> > 1 = Decrease a lot ..... to .... 5 = Increase a lot, but what do I do with NOT SURE?
> > Also - an increase in "coastal tourism" would be a good thing, while an increase in "Electricity Prices" would be a bad thing. Does this matter? Do I still code these the same? Or does the order on the coding reverse in some way?
> > Any advice would be much appreciated!
> > Kind regards
> > Sanja
> >
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/