Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtnbreg, fe does not converge when xtpoisson does
From
Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtnbreg, fe does not converge when xtpoisson does
Date
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:40:41 +0200
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Anastasiya Zavyalova wrote:
> I have a dependent count variable. The range is
> from 0 to 800,000. When I run an xtpoisson with fixed effects it runs
> well and, in fact, all my coefficients are highly signifiant.
> However, when I run an xtnbreg with a fixed-effects option (turns out
> the variable is over-dispersed), I receive the following error
> message: "discontinuous region encountered; cannot compute an
> improvement; r(430);" What could be the reason? Thank you.
A negative binomial model is a much more complicated model than a
Poisson, so the fact that a Poisson converges does not guarantee that
a negative binomial will converge as well.
-- Maarten
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/