Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: Bonferroni-holm |
Date | Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:07:58 -0700 |
Read the literature on multiple comparisons! Books have been available for over 20 years Sent from my iPhone Tony Lachenbruch On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:39 AM, "Sadjad Riahi" <sadjad.riahi@gmail.com> wrote: > dear statalist, > I have found In a paper with the similar methodology with ours that > for correction of multiple comparisons, authors have applied > bonferroni-holm correction. To explain the analysis in short, they > have several dependent variable (subcorticalgray matter region > volumes) and three groups of diagnosis, intracranial volumes,age and > sex as predictor variables.they have fitted a GLM for each region > volume as the dependant variable seperately, then F test was preformed > and subsequently contrast analysis. but for multiple comparison they > first corrected for the omnibus test and then correction for pairwise > comparison for each GLM that survived the first round of correction > was performed. Can you please enlighten me with this correction > procedure more in detail. > > yours, > > Sadjjad Riahi > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/