Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: hausman test
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: hausman test
Date
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:51:07 +0200
Hi:
Download -xtoverid- from SSC. Run -xtreg- and after you estimate your
model simply type xtoverid. This test can accommodate a robust vce too,
and is a generalized form of the Hausman test (to examine whether one
can constrain the fixed-effects to not correlate with the regressors,
which is a canned constraint made by the random-effects estimator). Help
-help xtoverid- for more information.
HTH,
John.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 16.07.2012 20:56, Ozgur Ozdemir wrote:
hi,
when I run the Hausman test I get the following message"V_b-V_B is not positive definite", then if I run the test the other way around Like "hausman random fixed" then I get a negative Chi-Square model fitted on these data fails to meet the asymptotic assumptions of the Hausman test; see suest for a generalized test. ?
kind regards
Ozgur
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/