Re: st: SUR

[John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>]

Hi Mesut:

Take a look at the Stata command  -sem-.   You can estimate SUR models 
(see Ex. 12) with missing data using the -method(mlmv)- option.

HTH,
John.

__________________________________________

Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 14.07.2012 16:02, Mesut Karakas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are using sur (seemingly unrelated regression), but our equations
> do not have the same number of observations due to missing variables.
> To cope with this issue, there exists a solution:
> http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0079
> But this solution takes too much time.
> Is there anyone who can help with this problem in a basic way (i.e. a
> command in stata or add-in etc).
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Mesut Karakas
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/