Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: on interactions of endogenous variables with an exogenous one and xtivreg2
From
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: on interactions of endogenous variables with an exogenous one and xtivreg2
Date
Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:09:40 +0100 (BST)
Dear all,
I have an issue with a regression that includes endogenous variable (x) and its interaction with an exogenous one (m). y is the dependent variable and z is the instrument.
In this case, it was recommended to me to run two first stage regressions:
1) x on z m and the set of control variables
[where I have to store fitted values (e.g. in a variable store1 ) ]
2) x*m on z*m and the set of control variables (without including m in this regression)
[where I have to store fitted values (e.g. in a variable store2 )]
Next I have to move to the second stage:
3) y on store1 store2 m and the set of control variables
I would like to ask you whether conceptually this model is a correct one in this case. For example m does not enter in regression 1. Intuitively I would prefer to run the following regression where F denotes the set of control variables:
xtivreg2 y (x x*m = z z*m) m F
However m enters in both first stage regressions in this case.
My second question refers to its estimation with xtivreg2. From reading previous posts, I have also found that I cannot store predicted values from the first stage with xtivreg2. Is there a possibility to overcome this limitation by using another command to predict and store the RHSs from step 1 and 2 so I can estimate this model? (I use fixed effects and I have to cluster by the panel id)
Best,
Rado
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/