Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Jennifer Dent <JDent@sgul.ac.uk> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Re lincom not recognising macros |
Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:46:59 +0100 |
Dear Nick Apologies for the typos.Re using the 'indirect' solution - I want to run the function several times over several different datasets, within which the values of the (local) variables will change slightly. I'll have a think about which is more efficient, given the solution.
Thank you for your help, Jennifer On 26/06/2012 11:21, Nick Cox wrote:
There are no macros (marcos, macors) here. What you may be seeking is local var1_prop = 0.46 local var2_prop = 0.54 lincom _b[_cons] + _b[indep1]*`var1_prop' + _b[indepvar2]*`var2_prop' although I don't see why you would prefer that to your direct solution, which as you say does work. Nick On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jennifer Dent<JDent@sgul.ac.uk> wrote:I'm trying to run lincom in stata 12 but I am having trouble when I use a marco name, rather than a number. This is what I have: gen var1_prop = 0.46 gen var2_prop = 0.54 xi:xtmixed depvar indep1 indep2 || randomeffect lincom _b[_cons] + _b[indep1]*var1_prop + _b[indepvar2]*var2_prop Error: var1_prop not found If I replace var1_prop and var2_prop with the actual numbers (i.e. lincom _b[_cons] + _b[indep1]*0.46 + _b[indepvar2]*0.54), then stata is happy. Is there a way to force lincom to recognise my numeric macors by name, rather than to have to find and replace the names with numbers?* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/