Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: First stage of panel IV
From
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: First stage of panel IV
Date
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:00:39 +0100
Filippos,
You need to tell us more - what versions of software you are using, what
the actual output is (or the relevant pieces of the output), etc.
More comments below.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Filippos Petroulakis
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: First stage of panel IV
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am running a panel first differences (fixed effects) model.
> My regression is of the sort
>
> y_it=b_0+b_1 x_it + b_k demographic_covariates + e_it
>
> x_it is endogenous so I have an instrument z_it.
>
> I essentially have 3 issues and I list them in descending
> order of importance.
>
> 1) xtivreg2 is running the first stage of x_it on z_it and
> the exogenous demographic covariates as OLS instead of fixed
> effects or first differences.
I doubt it very much (having programmed -xtivreg2-, I think I'm well
placed to say this!). -xtivreg2- follows the standard procedure of
transforming the full set of variables used in the same say, i.e., the
within or between transformation is applied to all variables.
> I honestly do not know whether
> this is due to theory but it seems to be very odd, especially
> given the fixed effects is definitely the correct
> specification for the model as a whole, and so I would think
> it has to be the case for the first stage as well. I can do
> the 2 stages manually and correct the errors using the
> process outlined here
> (http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/ivreg.html) and I
> presume the fact that I have a panel doesn't change much, but
> my issue is basically whether this is the correct thing to do.
>
> 2) xtivreg and xtivreg2 give me pretty different results,
> which is due to the fact that xtivreg drops about half of the
> observations in the first stage. I checked and the variable
> that is causing the dropping (for whatever reason) is the
> dependent variable. I am thus positive that xtivreg is the
> wrong one but am still worried. Anyone knows why this happens?
Again, I doubt the problem is the one you suspect. My guess is that
Most likely you are using different estimators, e.g., fixed effects with
-xtivreg2- and random effects with -xtivreg-. But you need to show us
the output.
> 3) Finally, at some point I will need to include a further
> two variables, call them w_it and q_it, which are surely
> endogenous. I don't care about instrumenting for them as I am
> not interested in a causal interpretation, but the problem is
> that they are also endogenous to x_it. So my first stage will
> be regression x_it on variables that are endogenous to itself
> and to y_it. Is that an issue I should be concerned about?
This is confusing. Do you mean that w_it and q_it are correlated with
x_it? That's not a problem. The key requirement is that in
y_it=b_0+b_1 x_it + b_k demographic_covariates + w_it + q_it + e_it ,
w_it and q_it should be uncorrelated with e_it. If they are correlated,
then you have two options: (1) Add w and q to your list of endogenous
variables. But as you say, you will need instruments for them. And if
you aren't interested in a causal interpretation, then maybe you
shouldn't bother. (2) Instead of using w and q as regressors and
instrumenting them, insert the instruments as (exogenous) regressors.
HTH,
Mark
> Thank you very much in advance - answers to any or all of
> those issues will be immensely appreciated.
>
> Best,
>
> Filippos Petroulakis
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times
Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/