Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: instrumenting interaction and Hansen J statistic
From
"Bernini, Michele" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: instrumenting interaction and Hansen J statistic
Date
Mon, 28 May 2012 14:59:07 +0200
Dear statalister,
I am using the command ivreg2 to estimate by 2sls this kind of model:
y= A + B + ( A*X B*X X = A*Z1 A*Z_2 B*Z_1 B*Z_2 Z_1 Z_2) +controls
where X is the endogenous variable that I want to interact with the exogenous regressors A and B, and Z_1 and Z_2 are my two instruments. I had a look on the internet and it seems legitimate to instrument interaction terms this way. However the Hansen statistic is not convincing. When I include all the 6 instruments it gives me a p-value of 0.39, however when I use only 4 of them (in different combinations) the p value gets as smaller as 0.07. First stage statistics look rather good (high F values and K-P stat).
I was wondering whether the failure to reject the validity of the instruments could be caused by high collinearity among them and if someone has a better strategy to instrument the interaction terms.
Thanks a lot,
Michele
p.s. sorry if this email reaches you twice but I am not sure that the first one was sent correctly
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/