Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: st: power repeated measures anova vs mixed models
From
"Airey, David C" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
re: st: power repeated measures anova vs mixed models
Date
Thu, 24 May 2012 10:01:26 -0500
.
I just came across this software for longitudinal / hierarchical experimental design power analysis:
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/group-based/optimal_design_software
I've not used it, but it might help you avoid simulation.
-Dave
> Dear all,
>
> I have been struggling to find an answer or reference to this problem.
>
> I am planning a longitudinal analysis comparing 3 groups with 6 time points per subject. The design is balance with 65 subjects for group.
>
> Because I do not have preliminary data and do not want to make unrealistic assumptions about the covariate structure and other parameters required to calculate power for mixed models, I decided to use repeated measures ANOVA to estimate the minimum detectable effect size at 80% power.
> My questions are, will the mixed model have more power that the repeated measures ANOVA in this case? Are there any references regarding these comparisons?
>
> Thank you,
> Ricardo
>
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/