Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtreg fixed effects
From
Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: xtreg fixed effects
Date
Thu, 24 May 2012 09:06:31 -0400
<>
On May 24, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Nick wrote:
> 1. Each panel contributes at least one data point to the -xtreg-.
> That's information!
>
> 2. Each singleton panel contains no information about within-panel
> variability, or rather implies that within-panel variability is zero
> in some cases. But that is only part of the data's properties.
I beg to differ.
webuse grunfeld
drop if year>1935 & company>1
xtreg invest mvalue kstock,fe
reg invest mvalue kstock if company==1
illustrates that the slope coefficients, in both point and interval form, from the one complete panel are the same as those computed from that panel and nine singleton panels. The R^2s are identical, as are the F-statistics, with the same d.f. sigma_e from the xtreg is equal to RMS Error from the OLS regression. So I fail to see any value in considering these singleton panels. They do give you a different constant term, but one could argue that a FE regression doesn't really have a constant term anyway.
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/