Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: joint estimation of OLS and logit in seemingly unrelated regressions
From
#WANG ZITIAN# <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: joint estimation of OLS and logit in seemingly unrelated regressions
Date
Wed, 23 May 2012 13:49:58 +0000
Thanks Maarten.
However, I find that using suest command with clustering generates almost the same standard errors comparing estimating each individual regression with clustering option. Could you explain why it is the case? Or I made a mistake here ?
. cap drop _est*
. reg rnd etrm_before
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rnd | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
etrm_befor~y | .1490155 .0154133 9.67 0.000 .1187669 .1792641
_cons | .040344 .003745 10.77 0.000 .0329945 .0476936
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. est store ols
. logit apply etrm_before_apply
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
apply | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
etrm_befor~y | 4.738024 .6010609 7.88 0.000 3.559966 5.916082
_cons | -.8450138 .1036933 -8.15 0.000 -1.048249 -.6417786
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. est store logit
. suest ols logit, vce (cluster stkcd_order)
Simultaneous results for ols, logit
Number of obs = 939
(Std. Err. adjusted for 672 clusters in stkcd_order)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ols_mean |
etrm_befor~y | .1490155 .0280263 5.32 0.000 .0940849 .2039461
_cons | .040344 .0041447 9.73 0.000 .0322205 .0484675
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ols_lnvar |
_cons | -4.860371 .1396304 -34.81 0.000 -5.134041 -4.5867
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
logit_apply |
etrm_befor~y | 4.738024 .8938238 5.30 0.000 2.986161 6.489886
_cons | -.8450138 .128236 -6.59 0.000 -1.096352 -.5936759
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
end of do-file
. logit apply etrm_before_apply, cluster(stkcd_order)
(Std. Err. adjusted for 672 clusters in stkcd_order)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
apply | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
etrm_befor~y | 4.738024 .8938238 5.30 0.000 2.986161 6.489886
_cons | -.8450138 .128236 -6.59 0.000 -1.096352 -.5936759
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. reg rnd etrm_before, cluster(stkcd_order)
(Std. Err. adjusted for 672 clusters in stkcd_order)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
rnd | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
etrm_befor~y | .1490155 .0280413 5.31 0.000 .0939563 .2040747
_cons | .040344 .0041469 9.73 0.000 .0322015 .0484865
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Maarten Buis
发送时间: 23 May 2012 20:21
收件人: [email protected]
主题: Re: st: joint estimation of OLS and logit in seemingly unrelated regressions
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:10 PM, #WANG ZITIAN# wrote:
> I want to apply seemingly unrelated regression method to two regressions, one being OLS and another one being logistic regression. I don't think the "sureg" can do this as "sureg" is designed for two OLS regressions. Is there a code/command in Stata that can deal with my case?
-help suest-
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/