Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: comparing nested models after multiple imputation
From
Chelsea Garneau <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: comparing nested models after multiple imputation
Date
Sun, 20 May 2012 21:09:53 -0400
Thank you, Kieran. Would that be Wald tests using the F-statistic in
the output? With df = 1?
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kieran McCaul <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>
> I think that this is currently a "work in progress" area and there is no method for performing LR tests with imputed data.
>
> The alternative is to use -mi test- and perform Wald tests.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chelsea Garneau
> Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 3:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: comparing nested models after multiple imputation
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to compare nested models using xtreg, xtlogit,
> xtmelogit, xtmixed after doing multiple imputation. By "nested models" I
> mean subsequent models with additional predictors added, not multilevel -
> though my data are multilevel data as well. Because the LL's are not
> pooled, there is no e(ll) for the lrtest. Rubin's rules combine parameter
> estimates and standard errors, not LL's, but what is the best way to test
> nested models using xt commands after mi?
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/