Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | RE: st: another question on the interpretation of rho and atanhrho |
| Date | Tue, 8 May 2012 11:12:41 -0700 |
is it possible that we have a radian vs. degree question here? I make that blunder all the time. ________________________________________ From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of David Roodman (droodman@cgdev.org) [DRoodman@cgdev.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:28 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: another question on the interpretation of rho and atanhrho -0.244 is not tanh(-2.489), so there must be something wrong with this example. Stipulating a 10% significance level, 2 is more correct. --David