Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: ivreg2 question
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: ivreg2 question
Date
Tue, 1 May 2012 17:40:49 -0400
Not only that, the spelling "STATA" in your post is not correct. Unlike
Unlike "SAS", "SPSS", and "SUDAAN", "Stata" is not an acronym; i.e. it is not formed from letters of other words. See the FAQ.
Steve
[email protected]
On May 1, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Austin Nichols wrote:
Jana von Stein <[email protected]>:
No, because that would be econometrically illegitimate.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jana von Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible to prevent STATA from including in step 1
> estimation the (exogenous) independent variables from step 2? From what I
> can tell, partial doesn't do the trick.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/