Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: heteroskedasticity problem in panel
From
parisa <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: heteroskedasticity problem in panel
Date
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
I 'd like to get some expert advice on heteroskedasticity in panel data.
I have an unbalanced panel with N=20 group and T=28 time period.
I followed the heteroskedasticity test described in the FAQ using xtgls
(http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/panel.html ) .
The following test I have done:
xtgls depvar indvars, igls panels(heteroskedastic)
estimates store hetero
xtgls depvar indvars
local df = e(N_g) - 1
lrtest hetero . , df(`df')
Result:
(log-likelihoods of null models cannot be compared)
Likelihood-ratio test LR chi2(12) =
248.60
(Assumption: nohetero nested in hetero) Prob > chi2 =
0.0000
So I clearly have a heteroskedasticity problem. But I have two questions:
1-What is the meaning of the first sentence in the test result
(log-likelihoods of null models cannot be compared)?
2-how to correct for heteroskedasticity in panel data except GLS (xtgls
depvar indvars, igls panels(heteroskedastic))?
Thank you
--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/heteroskedasticity-problem-in-panel-tp7511182.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/