Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command
From
"Hoang Dinh Quoc" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command
Date
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:30:17 +0700
Thanks Maarten,
I just want to run for z transformation and it suggests mibeta command can
work. Maybe other command produces z transformation?
Best,
Quoc
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maarten Buis
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 3:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Hoang Dinh Quoc wrote:
> It does not work with other mi estimates such as mi estimate: reg y x1 x2
> x3... and it reports the same 'no imputations'.
>
> I have no missing values in my dataset. Can this be the problem?
Why do you want to use multiple imputation if you do not have missing
values?
-- Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/