Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Hoang Dinh Quoc" <hoangdquoc@gmail.com> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command |
Date | Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:29:26 +0700 |
Thanks Richard, It does not work with other mi estimates such as mi estimate: reg y x1 x2 x3... and it reports the same 'no imputations'. I have no missing values in my dataset. Can this be the problem? Best, Quoc -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Williams Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:51 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu; statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: St: z transformation - mibeta command At 11:36 PM 4/23/2012, Hoang Dinh Quoc wrote: >Dear Statalist members, > >When I used the command 'mibeta' in Stata for z transformation and I got a >message stating 'no imputations'. Could anyone please tell me this problem? > >I converted my data into flong style (the command mi des tells 'Style: >flong'. > >Best, >Quoc My first guess would be that there is some sort of problem with your imputations, but without seeing more of your code or output it is impossible to tell. Do other mi estimate commands work, e.g. can you do something like mi estimate: reg y x1 x2 x3 without any problems? ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/