Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: identifying set of cases analyzed
From
Sebastián Daza <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: identifying set of cases analyzed
Date
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:46:36 -0500
Great! Thank you!
2012/4/22 Nick Cox <[email protected]>:
> Often documented, e.g. after model fitting you can go
>
> gen used = e(sample)
>
> Look for documentation on e(sample) and also
>
> SJ-7-2 dm0030 . . . . . . . . . . Stata tip 44: Get a handle on your sample
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Jann
> Q2/07 SJ 7(2):266--267 (no commands)
> tip on how to keep track of the observations that make
> up your estimation sample
>
>
> 2012/4/22 Sebastián Daza <[email protected]>:
>
>> I am doing some analysis with an unbalanced panel data. I also have
>> some missing data in the covariates. Does anyone know how (easily) to
>> create a flag variable indicating what cases I am using (e.g., a
>> xtlogit model, re or fe) so that to use the same set of cases in
>> several less complex models (models with fewer covariates)?
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Sebastián Daza
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/