Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtmixed command
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtmixed command
Date
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:16:27 +0200
The best explanation to what, specifically, a random (vs fixed) effects
model does is here:
Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A General Panel Model with Random
and Fixed Effects: A Structural Equations Approach. Social Forces,
89(1), 1-34.
HTH,
J.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 19.04.2012 23:55, D. Demetriou wrote:
Thank you for your comments!
This is how i think of it: Fixed-effects are equivalent to n
entity-specific dummies, in effect allowing for varying intercepts
across regions.
A mixed effect (random intercept) model allows for the region-specific
intercepts to vary from one wave/panel to the other (instead of
assuming that entity-specific intercepts are constant over time).
Is this the correct intuition?? I hope it is!
Truly yours,
DD
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/