Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Bootstrapping in svy with vce(linearized)
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Bootstrapping in svy with vce(linearized)
Date
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:03:59 -0400
Rini Rao:
Look at the results of -svy: regress- again; they state the reason for the missing standard errors; it has little to do with sample size. Also re-read the -help- for -svyset- about the consequences of choosing the singleunit(missing) option. Choose a different one; I suggest "centered" as the most conservative.
And, as Stas pointed out, you must incorporate your -if- clause into the subpop() definition.
Steve
[email protected]
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Rini Rao wrote:
Hello fellow Stata folks,
I am using the NHANES data with the svy command and vce(linearized).
For my analysis, I have created subgroups based on certain parameters
for complete data. e.g (s_white_1840)
For certain subgroups, I have ended up with very small sample sizes
(e.g. n=353) and in some cases I only get a model co-efficient
estimate without accompanying standard errors.
e.g.
. svyset psu [pweight=wtsaf], strata(strata) vce(linearized) singleunit(missing)
. xi: svy, sub(s_gaby_diab_1318): regress egfr abdobes if homa_1318<4 & htn==0
(running regress on estimation sample)
Survey: Linear regression
Number of strata = 74 Number of obs
= 1544
Number of PSUs = 148 Population size = 6726762.5
Subpop. no. of obs = 1544
Subpop. size = 6726762.5
Design df = 74
F(
0, 74) = .
Prob
> F = .
R-squared = 0.0029
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Linearized
egfr | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
abdobes | 3.147383 . . . . .
_cons | 92.33331 . . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: missing standard errors because of stratum with single sampling unit.
Now, how can I obtain unbiased S.E. and confidence intervals for this
estimate. Is it acceptable to run a bootstrap using this command? (I
get a reasonable output using this command but I don't know if it
makes sense to use this).
bootstrap _b _se if homa_1318<4 & fabg<100 & htn==0, reps(1000)
strata(s_gaby_diab_1318) seed(89) : regress egfr abdobes
Harini Sarathy.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/