Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: st: Stata 12 -twoway function, horizontal recast(area)- bug affecting -confunnel-


From   Tom Palmer <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: Re: st: Stata 12 -twoway function, horizontal recast(area)- bug affecting -confunnel-
Date   Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:59:58 +0100

With thanks to Stata Corp this bug has indeed been fixed in yesterday's (4th April) update.

  Tom
 
> Tom Palmer <[email protected]> reported
> 
> > There is a problem in Stata version 12.1 (and 12.0) when -twoway function- > is used with the -horizontal- and -recast(area)- options. In the following
> > the second overlaid plot is drawn incorrectly:
> >
> >  twoway function x, horizontal || function x, horizontal recast(area)
> >
> > The bug does not occur when I run this code in Stata version 11.2, but
> > strangely does occur in Stata 12.1 under version control, i.e. the above
> > command prefixed with say -version 11.2:-
> >
> > My -confunnel- program (for contour enhanced funnel plots in meta-analysis)
> > uses commands like this and hence its plots under Stata 12 with shaded
> > regions (the default) are now incorrect, luckily -confunnel- plots using
> > the -noshadedregions- option are unaffected.
> >
> 
> In the 06feb2012 update of Stata 12, -twoway area- was changed to use an
> internal drawing routine that is significantly faster over large datasets.
> A bug was introduced in the process which drew the plot incorrectly if
> the -horizontal- option was used.
> 
> We will fix the bug in the next executable update.
> 
> 
> Hua
> [email protected]


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index