Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: Normality and Granger Causality in Panel Data
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Re: Normality and Granger Causality in Panel Data
Date
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:07:45 +0100
DD is quite correct and I am happy to acknowledge that. But his email
showed up in my inbox as coming from him, not Statalist.
I will speak for myself -- but I also I guess for most of the more
active people on the list -- in saying thanks, but I don't need or
want two copies of the same reply if I post to Statalist.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM, D. Demetriou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Thank you for you comments and for immediate reply.
>
> I did not send it privately, you were just 'cc'; the email wa sent to STATA
> List. Sincere apologies if this is also not allowed according to STATA list
> rules.
>
> Well, as you said, is all about testing the normality of residuals in order
> to cerrectly infer from t-statistics and f-statistics (e.g. significance of
> coefficients, joint significance tests, etc)
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/