Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Binary Choice Model and fixed effects - interpreting the interaction effects?
From
Benjamin Niug <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Binary Choice Model and fixed effects - interpreting the interaction effects?
Date
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:57:44 +0200
Hey guys,
I want to estimate a binary choice model accunting for time-invariant
fixed effects (I read I could use the -xtlogit- or -clogit- command).
y_it = b_1*x_1_it*x_2_it+b_2*x_1_it + b_3*x_2_it
However, I have included an interaction effect which I want to
interpret correctly - as pointed out by Ai and Norton (2004) this is
not trivial. They suggest to use a user written command called
-inteff-. This command works well if -logit- is used, however, it does
not work if -xtlogit- or -clogit- is used.
Error:
"last estimates not found
r(301);"
My Stata code:
clogit labor_participation ABC minority ABC_minority expenses Obvious
ageHH HH_female profess informal_employed language muslim,
group(country_xxx) vce(cluster country_xxx)
inteff labor_participation ABC minority ABC_minority expenses
Obvious ageHH HH_female profess informal_employed language muslim,
savedata(ABC_minority_rural, replace) savegraph1(ABC_minority_rural_1,
replace) savegraph2(ABC_minority_rural_2, replace)
Does anybody have an idea why this is the case and how I can still get
the correct interpretations of the interaction effects?
Best,
Benjamin
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/