Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Robert Davidson <rhd773@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: stcox question |
Date | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:46:48 -0400 |
Hello, I am estimating several hazard models, using stcox, using the by command to separate by whether or not the the observations (people) have criminal records. I am estimating a standard model: by crime, sort: stcox (varlist) and clustering the standard errors. I would like to test whether some of my coefficients/hazard rates (of variables in varlist) for one type (say those with criminal records) are significantly larger than for the other type. Is there a way I can do this that does not involve running the model on the full sample and creating an interaction term (criminal record * var x)? I would like to avoid all of the issues that arise with interaction coefficients in binary models as people in my area are quite skeptical of the interpretation of such interactions. I know I can estimate a logit model and use the Norton et al. correction for the interaction, but I would like to find a more convincing way to test this difference across models. Thank you, Rob * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/