Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Testing the validity of instruments when estimating a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected standard errors
From
Natalie Trapp <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Testing the validity of instruments when estimating a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected standard errors
Date
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:14:28 +0100
Hi,
I estimate a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected robust standard errors
as follows
xtdpd y l3.y_rain x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, dgmmiv(l3.y_rain, lag(2 3)) dgmmiv(x1
x2 x3, lag(2) ) lgmmiv(x1 x2 x3,lag(2)) div(x4 x5 ) twostep hascons
vce(robust)
When using the vce(vcetype) option, the sargan statistic cannot be
obtained because the distribution of the Sargan test is unknown when the
disturbances are heteroscedastic. However, I need to test the validity
of over-identifying restrictions and was thinking whether one can use
the same model without a Windmeijer correction (without vce(robust)) to
test for the validity of over-identifying restrictions and then infer on
the robust model?
Thank you,
Natalie
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/