Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Calculating rolling averages
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Calculating rolling averages
Date
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:26:52 +0000
No. The documentation for -egen- does warn against using subscripts in
-egen- calls but that is not the main issue here. The way -if- works
is to select observations and
if date[_n] > date
is just a slightly long-winded way of saying
if date > date
which selects no observations. (Your point that date[1] < date[2] is
no doubt true for your judges but not pertinent to explaining what is
going on here.) In any case, -egen-'s -mean()- function calculates
means for blocks of observations but otherwise does not respect order
of observations in any sense.
You could just -tsset- in terms of a pseudo-time variable that is the
number of cases so far seen.
Alternatively, if you want the average so far handled that is at its simplest
bysort id (date) : gen mean = sum(offense_9) / _n
but much depends on precisely what the variable is. Any missing values
would require more complicated code.
Nick
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, William Hauser <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am attempting to calculate the percentage of cases handled by a
> judge that meet some criterion (e.g. being a violent offender). The
> data cover 13 years so obviously the averages for each judge change
> overtime. My first thought was the following command:
>
> bysort id date: egen pct=mean(offense_9) if date[_n]>date
>
> I had hoped that Stata would calculate the average based only on cases
> with a earlier (smaller) date but instead the command results in all
> missing values because date[1]<date[2] and so forth.
>
> Another thought was to use the rolling command (which I'm not sure how
> to do anyways) but this requires the use of tsset. When I tsset my
> data I get an error, "repeated time values within panel" presumably
> because each judge handles multiple cases a day.
>
> I imagine this is probably a simple matter of syntax but I am in well
> over my head. Any insight you could provide would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/