Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: using egen, total() with weights
From
Sheera Joy Olasky <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: using egen, total() with weights
Date
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:53:02 -0500
Hi Statalist,
I have a set of individual level survey data, which includes
person-weights. I would like to create population totals by year and
state. I am using Stata 11.2.
Originally I had thought to use bysort id: egen pop=total(weight)
where id is the state-year.
However, it was then suggested to me that I should be using sum
[aweight=weight]. This seems more complicated to me, since I'm not
sure how/if I could make new variables with the sum output in the same
way that I get a new variable with egen total (weights). Use of
scalars was recommended, but I have no experience with them.
Initially, when I compared the values I got with egen total(weight)
and sum [aweight=weight], they were very close--maybe off by about 4
people out of over 80,000,000. This imprecision is okay in this
scenario, but it got me concerned. I thought that perhaps there was
too much rounding happening with egen, so I generated the
total(weight) as double. The increased precision seems to have helped,
and now egen total(weight) and sum [aweight=weight] appear to give me
the same results when I spot check.
I don't feel completely confident, though. Before I go ahead and use
egen, I'd like to know if this is okay or ill-advised. I'd be curious
to know others' preferred way of handling this.
Thanks.
Sheera
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/