Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: panel data
From
Joerg Luedicke <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: panel data
Date
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:55:14 -0500
-help mi-
J.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Deepti Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot Sola and Nick for guiding me towards multiple imputation.
>
> However, some of commands like 'mim' are not working in my version of stata. I am using Stata 11. Can somebody please guide me towards the link that explains stata commands for "multiple imputation" in Stata 11.
>
> Thanks!
> Deepti
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:46 PM
> Subject: Re: st: RE: panel data
>
> This link will help to understand multiple imputation:
> ttp://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/STATA/faq/mi_longitudinal.htm
> I hope this help.
> Sola
> Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:01:03
> To: '[email protected]'<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: panel data
>
> How would you force Stata to use observations with missing values in any regression? What's a "best case scenario" here? Have you thought about multiple imputation?
>
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Deepti Garg
>
>
> I have around 170 firms and around 16 variables in a panel data with firms having data for at the most 5 years. However, I dont have data for all the firms for all the variables. So, when I run regression command, stata only picks the data which has the data for all the variables and my results are inappropriate.
>
> However, when I run the regression with each independent variable separately, I get the desired results. Is it valid to run separate regressions for all the variables and analyse the
> results. Or, is there any way where I can force stata to consider records which do not have all the data and take a best case scenario?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
> Deepti
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/