Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RE: st: repeated measures ANOVA to MANOVA - revisit
From
"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: RE: st: repeated measures ANOVA to MANOVA - revisit
Date
Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:01:34 -0600
Just to set the record straight - I was replying on behalf of Rob Ploutz Snyder, who couldn't get his statalist messages to post.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 5:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RE: st: repeated measures ANOVA to MANOVA - revisit
Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]> is concerned by a statement
by Alan Feiveson <[email protected]> concerning ANOVA.
> I checked the UCLA page suggested and I did not find anything
> regarding repeated measures ANOVA or MANOVA. I am now very
> concerned about your statement that you "... have abandoned
> Stata's implementation(s) of repeated measures ANOVA entirely, as
> I am rarely able to get it to replicate what I know to be
> accurate with other software". Is there something wrong with
> Stata's ANOVA?
Nothing is wrong with the answers from Stata's -anova-. Stata's
-anova- (including the repeated measures part) has been
thoroughly tested against several sources. I am guessing that
Alan's complaint is that he finds it difficult to determine the
correct specification of options in -anova- to do some
repeated-measure ANOVAs.
Ken Higbee
<[email protected]>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/