Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Tetrachoric correlations and survey data
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Tetrachoric correlations and survey data
Date
Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:34:00 -0500
While the official -tetrachoric- does not support [pweights] or the
-svy- features, my -polychoric- would support [pweights] and
-cluster()- option (although the way it produces the output, it is
only relevant for pairwise correlations when the standard errors are
really reported). It does not matter for the point estimates though.
The chi-square goodness of fit tests will be wrong. The standard
errors via the bootstrap is certainly an option, although you would
need to perform the bootstrap in a way that respects the complex
design features
(http://stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0187).
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Ronald McDowell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it possible to compute tetrachoric correlations of ordinal data in STATA to take account of survey weights and stratification?
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Ron McDowell
>
> Institute of Nursing Research
>
> University of Ulster, Coleraine
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/