Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: panel data
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: panel data
Date
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:16:48 +0000
This link will help to understand multiple imputation:
ttp://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/STATA/faq/mi_longitudinal.htm
I hope this help.
Sola
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:01:03
To: '[email protected]'<[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: panel data
How would you force Stata to use observations with missing values in any regression? What's a "best case scenario" here? Have you thought about multiple imputation?
Nick
[email protected]
Deepti Garg
I have around 170 firms and around 16 variables in a panel data with firms having data for at the most 5 years. However, I dont have data for all the firms for all the variables. So, when I run regression command, stata only picks the data which has the data for all the variables and my results are inappropriate.
However, when I run the regression with each independent variable separately, I get the desired results. Is it valid to run separate regressions for all the variables and analyse the results. Or, is there any way where I can force stata to consider records which do not have all the data and take a best case scenario?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks!
Deepti
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/