Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: indirect effects of indep vars in selection model on dep var


From   Mirko Moro <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: indirect effects of indep vars in selection model on dep var
Date   Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:16:40 +0100

Dear Statalisters,

I am interested in estimating the effect of  a variable Z on Y, where
Y can be either an ordered or a continuous variable. I know from my
theory that Z has an indirect effect on Y via a direct effect on W,
where W is a dummy variable. I also know that W and Z depends on
common set of factors F.

So I am thinking of estimating a system such as:

Y = Wa + Fb + e

Prob(W) = Zc + Fd + u.

I have cross-sectional data and I am thinking to use -treatreg- here
when Y is a continuos and or -cmp- by Roodman if Y is an ordered
response variable.

First, is this correct?

Second, one of my first research question is how much (the probability
of) Y changes because of Z via its indirect effect on W? Is it
possible to get an idea of the size of the indirect association?

A second research question linked to this would be how much the vector
F affects Y only via W?

In other words, I am not that interested in W itself...but in the size
of the indirect effects of the variables in the "selection model" .

Any suggestion on how these sizes could be reported and interpreted?

Best regards,

Mirko

-- 
Mirko Moro
Lecturer in Economics
Economics Division
University of Stirling
FK94LA
Scotland (UK)
t: +44(0)1786467479
f: +44(0)1786467469
e: [email protected]
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index