Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: xtivreg2 or new Stata12 command sem?
From
"Dithmer, Jan" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: xtivreg2 or new Stata12 command sem?
Date
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:23:27 +0100
Dear Statalisters,
I want to estimate a system of equations with panel data, where there are several interrelationships between the variables.
I estimated the first equation (1) with GMM using xtabond2, treating variable B as endogenous. However, I fear that I might lose
some potential indirect effects that B has on some explanatory variables in (1). I would use the sureg command, but it does not support panel data. My intuition tells me that, when B positively influences D and E, and they themselves have a positive coefficient in (1), the effect of B on Y in (1) should be greater than I have estimated, or I am wrong here?
(1) Y_it = a + bY_it-1 + cB_it + dC_it + eD_it + fE_it + error
(2) B_it = gY_it + hC_it + iF_it + error
(3) D_it = jB_it + kG_it+lH_it +error
(4) E_it = mB_it + nJ_it + error
So, my question is: how can I estimate the whole system of equations to capture all indirect effects? Might this be a task for the Structural equation modeling "sem" command in Stata12 (which I not have)
Or should I just estimate the equations separately using xtabond2 for the first and xtivreg2 for the rest? But then I already have the result of the first equation, in which I am mainly interested in...
Thanks for any suggestions!
Best, Jan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/