Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Quick question of using -concord- to investigate proportional errors
From
cecilia sam <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Quick question of using -concord- to investigate proportional errors
Date
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:29:18 +1300
Hi all,
I am new to statistics and Stata, and need help for using -concord- in
Stata 11.0 for Windows.
I am comparing two datasets derived from 2 different methods. I
natural log transformed both datasets on the original scale, and typed
-concord y x, loa(regline)-. The output provides the slope of the
regression line, and a p-value listed besides the Pearson r (I
attached a part of the Stata output and attached below). Is this the
p-value that indicate the signficance of the slope of the regression
line? In this case, does the p-value <0.05 mean that there are
statitically signficant proportional errors ?
Pearson's r = 0.271 Pr(r = 0) = 0.002 C_b = rho_c/r = 0.966
Reduced major axis: Slope = 1.301 Intercept = -2.727
Difference = y - x
Difference 95% Limits Of Agreement
Average Std Dev. (Bland & Altman, 1986)
---------------------------------------------------------------
0.010 0.333 -0.643 0.663
Correlation between difference and mean = 0.266
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Cecilia
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/